diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'data')
| -rw-r--r-- | data/samples/current/en/free_for_all.peter_wayner.sst | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | data/samples/current/en/two_bits.christopher_kelty.sst | 2 |
2 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/data/samples/current/en/free_for_all.peter_wayner.sst b/data/samples/current/en/free_for_all.peter_wayner.sst index d105996..eae2188 100644 --- a/data/samples/current/en/free_for_all.peter_wayner.sst +++ b/data/samples/current/en/free_for_all.peter_wayner.sst @@ -3086,7 +3086,8 @@ url: http://www.nytimes.com/library/1999/01/biztech/articles/15soft.html au: Bronson, Po ti: Manager's Journal Silicon Valley Searches for an Image src: Wall Street Journal -yr: June 8, 1998 +yr: 1998-06-08 +% yr: June 8, 1998 au: Bronson, Po ti: Nudist on the Late Shift: And Other True Tales of Silicon Valley @@ -3161,7 +3162,7 @@ yr: 1981 au: Gleick, James ti: Control Freaks src: New York Times -yr: July 19, 1998-07-19 +yr: 1998-07-19 au: Gleick, James ti: Broken Windows Theory @@ -3171,6 +3172,7 @@ yr: 1999-03-21 au: FatBrain.com ti: Interview with Linus Torvalds src: FatBrain.com, May 1999 +yr: 1999 url: http://www.kt.opensrc.org/interviews/ti19990528_fb.html au: Jelinek, Jakub diff --git a/data/samples/current/en/two_bits.christopher_kelty.sst b/data/samples/current/en/two_bits.christopher_kelty.sst index 63fde12..3beaca7 100644 --- a/data/samples/current/en/two_bits.christopher_kelty.sst +++ b/data/samples/current/en/two_bits.christopher_kelty.sst @@ -4441,8 +4441,6 @@ The open-access movement, and examples like Connexions, are attempts at maintain Understanding how Free Software works and how it has developed along with the Internet and certain practices of legal and cultural critique may be essential to understanding the reliable foundation of knowledge production and circulation on which we still seek to ground legitimate forms of governance. Without Free Software, the only response to the continuing forms of excess we associate with illegitimate, unaccountable, unjust forms of governance might just be mute cynicism. With it, we are in possession of a range of practical tools, structured responses and clever ways of working through our complexity toward the promises of a shared imagination of legitimate and just governance. There is no doubt room for critique—and many scholars will demand it—but scholarly critique will have to learn how to sit, easily or uneasily, with Free Software as critique. Free Software can also exclude, just as any public or public sphere can, but this is not, I think, cause for resistance, but cause for joining. The alternative would be to create no new rules, no new practices, no new procedures—that is, to have what we already have. Free Software does not belong to geeks, and it is not the only form of becoming public, but it is one that will have a profound structuring effect on any forms that follow. -:B~ Bibliography - 1~!bibliography Bibliography % ,{[pg 349]}, |