diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'data/samples/current/en/free_culture.lawrence_lessig.sst')
| -rw-r--r-- | data/samples/current/en/free_culture.lawrence_lessig.sst | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/data/samples/current/en/free_culture.lawrence_lessig.sst b/data/samples/current/en/free_culture.lawrence_lessig.sst index 588da66..19271ac 100644 --- a/data/samples/current/en/free_culture.lawrence_lessig.sst +++ b/data/samples/current/en/free_culture.lawrence_lessig.sst @@ -1437,7 +1437,7 @@ Congress was asked to respond to the Supreme Court's decision. But as with the p If we put these cases together, a pattern is clear: -table{~h c4; 10; 30; 30; 30; +table(h; c4: 10, 30, 30, 30){ CASE WHOSE VALUE WAS "PIRATED" @@ -3174,7 +3174,7 @@ At the start of this book, I distinguished between commercial and noncommercial In 1790, the law looked like this: -table{~h c3; 33; 33; 33; +table(h; c3: 33, 33, 33){ Publish @@ -3199,7 +3199,7 @@ The act of publishing a map, chart, and book was regulated by copyright law. Not By the end of the nineteenth century, the law had changed to this: -table{~h c3; 33; 33; 33; +table(h; c3: 33, 33, 33){ Publish @@ -3226,7 +3226,7 @@ In 1909 the law changed to regulate copies, not publishing, and after this chang ={ photocopyring machines } -table{~h c3; 33; 33; 33; +table(h; c3: 33, 33, 33){ Publish @@ -3244,7 +3244,7 @@ Free The law was interpreted to reach noncommercial copying through, say, copy machines, but still much of copying outside of the commercial market remained free. But the consequence of the emergence of digital technologies, especially in the context of a digital network, means that the law now looks like this: -table{~h c3; 33; 33; 33; +table(h; c3: 33, 33, 33){ Publish |